Rotec radial, r-2800, rotec r2800, rotec radial engine, radial engine,r2800,rotec 2800, rotec r-2800,rotec 3600, rotec r3600,7 cylinder,9 cyclinder, radial, airplanes. aircraft radial engine, rotec aircraft, airplanes, rotary engines, aircraft e

ROTEC RADIAL.COM 

Hit Counter

Click the banner below for the best website hosting - starting at $6 per month!!

Web hosting by ICDSoft

Rotec radial, r-2800, rotec r2800, rotec radial engine, radial engine,r2800,rotec 2800, rotec r-2800,rotec 3600, rotec r3600,7 cylinder,9 cyclinder, radial, airplanes. aircraft radial engine, rotec aircraft, airplanes, rotary engines, aircraft engines, nostalgic engines,

Jim Chernikeeff of ROTEC cheated his dealers with his unethical business practices. 

ROTEC failures and problems have occurred!

 

A threat  from Paul Chernikeeff:

"The website www.Rotecradial.com has recently been updated 11/06/2008 with libellous (sic)content that has originated from you, (name removed) as the original source.  The entire website is damaging and currently under US legal investigation. The owner and all contributors to this site are subject to our US layers (sic) scrutiny, who are proceeding with the matter. 

Paul Chernikeeff."

The owner was never mentioned in this website.  Did Chernikeeff recognize the truthful information and assume it was that owner??  Did it sound familiar??  Broken studs, bad sensors??  See the AN below.

ROTEC AIRWORTHINESS NOTICE

 Date 1st October 2008

 

RECREATIONAL AIRCRAFT AIRWORTHINESS NOTICE

AIRWORTHINESS NOTICE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:  011008-1-Issue1

COMPULSORY INSPECTION OF CYLINDER HOLD DOWN STUDS ON ROTEC R2800 ENGINES 

 

To:  All owners and operators of aircraft fitted with ROTEC R2800 engines manufactured before 01/04/07.

Background:  An owner has reported that several cylinder hold down studs were found to be broken (2 on Number 4 cylinder and 2 on Number 7 cylinder).  The remaining studs and nylock nuts were inspected; it was found that the studs were the wrong specification, being too soft for operation in areas where the high temperatures are encountered.

Discussion:   Anecdotal evidence would suggest that the engine manufacturer is aware of this problem.  The studs used were not designed to take shear loads and the fibre nylock nuts used are not recommended for use in areas where the temperature is above 230 deg F (See FAA AC 43.13-1B for further information).

Action Required:

 BEFORE NEXT FLIGHT:  Inspect all cylinder hold down studs for breakage, stretch and damage.  If broken studs are found, all studs must then be replaced with manufacturers approved replacements.

It is also recommended that all cylinder hold down nuts be replaced, with manufacturers approved replacement parts.

Recommended Further Action. This is a continuing airworthiness notice; this inspection should be performed at every periodic inspection.

Reports and Recording. The initial inspection is to be recorded in the aircraft log book

Citing this AN. Any defects found are to be reported to the RAAus office.

Steve Bell

Technical Manager

 

Defect Reporting is one of the primary ways we have in ensuring continued safety in our operations.

 

 

NEW INFO!!!

Read this recent email from a ROTEC owner that had bad dealings with Chirnikeeff.   He asked to remain anonymous for legal reason:

 

Upon initial start up the electronic ignition failed. (Hall effect system). I had the system checked out by an electrical engineer employed by a major electronics firm. The module was tested by another electronic technician who has worked for several NASA contractors. We informed Rotec and was charged $54 (plus $46 FEDEX) for a replacement Hall sensor. It failed as well. I tracked down the supply source Rotec uses and determined the cause for the failure of the Hall sensor to be a faulty ignition module. I "robbed' another R2800's module and the engine started right up. Rotec demanded the faulty sensors be returned to them. I had told them I would as soon as I was certain the fault was corrected. I was shocked at the sequence of insults and defamations slung at me by Jim.
 

I purchased some additional Hall Effect sensors from CH Ignitions for $1.50 each.  Rotec would not exchange the faulty module as they claimed it was scuffed up. It wasn't when I shipped it to them. Rotec wanted charge me $110 for a replacement part.  That was supposed to be their cost.  Internet searches showed the average cost is $ 80 retail. They claim it bench tested ok. 


..... It seems that Rotec did not incorporate a check valve in the oil pump which prevents a phenomenon known as "seepage". This will allow the entire contents of the external oil tank to drain into the crankcase when the engine is dormant. I also discovered oil in the # 3 cylinder prior to turning the prop. I consulted Rotec and received no procedure for clearing #3. I consulted Steve Curry of Radial Engines Limited (Steve is a world renowned radial engine expert.) and queried him on how to get the oil out of #3. The only safe way is to remove a plug from that cylinder and start the engine. Turning the prop backwards will mask the problem as the oil is merely sucked into the intake temporarily. When the next intake stroke occurs, oil is reintroduced to the cylinder and -hydraulic lock, bent rod! I passed the info an successful results to Rotec only to be chastised for not using a non-existent Rotec procedure.


Finally, oil shut-off valve installed, ignition fixed, I was able to test fly the engine. Did three T&L's. On postflight I discovered 4 broken cylinder base studs (two each on cyls. #4 &7). I contacted Rotec and discovered the engine had this known defect until about a year and a half ago. The problem is they used internal allen head set screws. UGH! These screw are of course, not designed for shear loads. They are extremely brittle. The washers are soft hardware store junk, and the nylock nuts are too soft. (FAA AC43.13-1B warns against using fiber lock nuts in the engine compartment, specifically if they will be exposed to temperatures in excess of 230 deg F.) I had to pull all seven cylinders (haven't started on the other R2800 yet.) and replace every cylinder stud. I estimate I've spent over 75 man hours of labor correcting the mistake.

Make no mistake, had I not discovered those broken studs, those "jugs" would have departed the aircraft with catastrophic effect.

It is in my and all Rotec customers interest to see the company and this fine engine survive. However, with Jim's attitude and practices the company is doomed.

This manufacturer must learn to accept constructive criticism and suggestions on modifications that have been proven to work (ie. seepage check valves, CDI ignition, etc.)

 

 

 

Email from Jim in response to my website - He now refuses support of an engine he manufactured - his way of blackmailing us into taking down this factual site:

"Both you and Chris are dishonest people. I refer you to http://www.rotecradial.com/index.htm despite you and Chris giving us assurances on settlement.

 Guess the meat in the sandwich will now be #### #### of ######, Texas. (ROTECRADIAL.COM Note:  We have protected the identity of the last known owner of the engine ).

 Engine number C010407 is now on a blacklist for support or service.

 Kindest Regards - Jim"

 

Received 01/08/08 from a source wishing to remain anonymous

(Story Not Confirmed, but it wouldn't surprise me, knowing how Chirnikeeff works! - He bought the plane from Hevle Aviation, I am told)

"Jim had an engine failure in his own aircraft the other day, the Flybaby, and tried to keep it quiet from the regulator.

Unfortunately, the regulator has found out and are chasing him as the aircraft does not have a current maintenance release, is therefore not allowed to fly legally, and are after info on what the cause of the failure was."

 

More reports to us:

 

"How is the ongoing issues with Rotec going ?  Probably the same as ours they supposedly don't exist. I have a report here on an engine that destroyed it self in flight the only issue is that the guy that did the inspection is now under a dark legal cloud from Rotec"

 

 

"Hi there,

a friend here in Western Australia who has a Hornet homebuilt sent me your report on the Rotec radial fiasco you have been subjected to, he knows of at least one buyer here who was given the cold shoulder when his engine failed.  Before I sent your message to my many aviation friends I thought I would check you out so I looked at your website and you appear to be dinkum. (read genuine just in case you are not familiar with Aussie slang) 

It is a shame that bastards like this give Aussies a bad name and I am sorry you are having this experience..."

 

"I also bought a 2800 from rotec about 20 months ago direct from the factory in Australia. I was about to test fly my aircraft in august when I herd of some disturbing incidents regarding the engine in Australia, after contacting Honest Jim he danced around the problems and put the blame on pilot handling he also misled me on another incident were he totally denied that the incident occurred, even though the engine in question was back in factory for repair. I would be grateful of any information of problems with the engine in the states ."

 

Google

 

BUYERS BEWARE!!!!

Bushwhacker Air began its relationship with James Chernikeeff of Rotec Radial Engineering in February of 2004.  We purchased a ROTEC Radial R-2800, prop and exhaust from them at full retail, and put a $3000 deposit on 3 more engines in May of 2004.  We weren’t able to get the engine in time for Sun and Fun, so we borrowed one from a customer (about 150 miles from me) to display.  Needless to say it was a big hit at the show, and there were several magazine articles and photos from that engine being on display. 

We were also appointed a service and parts facility for the US.  Our spot on his website stated that.  Jim and Rotec also stated that our airplane was flying, which it was not.  (I had heard that several “flying” projects weren’t).  I had given him updates and asked him to correct it several time, and he did not. 

At the show, we heard from one of the first “agents” (that’s what Chernikeeff calls his dealer) who stated he had bought several engines, and Chernikeeff was underselling him when the customers would contact him.  He told me to be careful, but I pawned him off as a bitter customer who really didn’t try. (I think it was Brian Henneman) 

We started working on our plane for the engine.  Jim stated the only way we would have success was to build a plane for it.  I never agreed. 

We received a ton of inquiries, but no sales.  We showed up at Oshkosh, and again had a good showing.  We talked to 2 very serious customers, and made plans to do an installation with one of them.  He sent me plans for a mount, and I sent them out to get quoted with a manufacturer.  I did not speak to him for several months (the project was for the following year at Osh, 8 months away) and he did not contact me, but he did contact Chernikeeff.  Jim sold him an engine and never contacted me once.  He said that the customer was frustrated with me.  I chalked it up for experience and leaned my lesson about staying in touch with the customer.   Although I wasn’t happy about losing the sale that way, I thought it was partly my fault.  Jim offered me a $2500 credit at that point toward my next purchase.  A nice gesture, I thought. 

I continued to advertise the engine through the internet, in print and at shows.  We also sold an engine here for a customer who could not use it, rather than sell our own engine.  We did not make a penny on it. We also began working with several manufacturers on a stainless steel exhaust ring. 

In December of 2004 I noticed Jim had taken my project spot off his website.  I contacted him and told him I didn’t think the engine/agent relationship was working and I wanted our deposit back.  He wrote back begging me to stay, and gave me a lead a month later.  The lead never responded to me, and he was right in our back yard. 

In February, 2005, I made a follow up call (lesson learned from above) on a prospective customer I had been dealing with.  I had not heard from him in a month.  He was building a Kitfox, and I was in the process of building motor-mount tooling.  When I contacted him, he stated he bought the engine right from ROTEC for better price.  Jim never contacted me about this customer. Another sale lost.  I contacted Jim again wishing to discontinue our relationship, and at this time he offered to give me the credit toward my next single engine purchase.  He did not offer any further discount for this lost sale. 

For the next 13 months I advertised, displayed, and promoted his engine.  I received plenty of leads and inquiries, but made no sales.  I began contacting other “agents”, who told me they had the same experience.  I learned of several problems with the engine, including rod failures (in flight), and gear reduction tolerance problems.  After learning this, one agent sold his engines at a loss and removed any trace of his affiliation with ROTEC.  This agent offered to send a new engine from his inventory to a customer here in the states that had a failure so he could get flying quickly.  Chernikeeff wouldn’t allow it, and blamed the failure on “hydraulic lock”  (10/06/07 - I have learned of another engine failure, appearing to be gearbox related)

 I also contacted Chernikeeff and asked for our refund.  After a month of waiting for a reply, he said that he would only refund $1500 due to the accounting costs.  I was not happy with this arrangement and the fight began.  Up until this point I had been extremely civil with him.  He stated that Bushwhacker Air had done nothing for his business, and began his attacks on my business.  (Check the 2004 SnF coverage – The ROTEC photos taken were all of our engine) He also threatened legal action against me if I were to tell anyone about this. 

 In June I demanded he send the refund, and he agreed to send $1500 that day.  I told him I would take further action if he did not.   In July, I asked where the $1500 refund was, and he sent me a suspicious looking invoice that showed a completed wire transfer transaction.  I contacted my partner and asked him to check the account.  No such deposit was ever made or attempted.  He has stated my partner is lying.  ($1500 to my partner is not worth him jeopardizing a long time friendship - I am appalled that he would insinuate that).  I contacted the financal institutions regarding the transfer and the "invoice".  It was determined that NO funds were wired, and the invoice fraudulent. 

Chernikeeff is a master at marketing and manipulation.  His only concern is to get engines to the states.  He uses up his agents for advertising.  His engines are not tested before leaving the factory, which is problematic in itself.  The customers are the test platforms.

Warranties are handled at the factory – in Australia!  You pay the shipping back and forth.  We originally offered to do the work here so customers could be better serviced, but he lost that opportunity.

We have nothing to gain now other than knowing that Chirnikeeff’s unethical business practices will end.  If you decide to buy, I can only hope your experience is not the same as mine.

Chernikeeff had also threatened Barnstormers.com as a party to a lawsuit against me when I posted an ad about his practices.  Barnstormers pulled the ad after the threat, worried that they could lose everything having to fight a frivolous law suit.  He does not want the truth to get out.  But he cannot lie about or deny what he said to me - I have everything documented. 

 Thanks for listening,

 

CONTACT US

rotec radial, r-2800, rotec r2800,rotec radial engine, radial engine,r2800,rotec 2800, rotec r-2800,rotec 3600, rotec r3600,7 cylinder,9 cyclinder, radial, airplanes. aircraft radial engine